INFO CENTER

WHAT JFK'S ASSASSINATION MAY TELL US ABOUT 9/11

For those who refuse to consider the evidence that Lee Harvey Oswald could not have been the lone assassin of President John F. Kennedy in 1963, JFK's assassination probably won't shed any light on 9/11.  For those who have looked at this evidence and agree that Oswald could not have been the lone assassin, JFK's assassination is very instructive.

If you still think that Oswald was the lone assassin, first have a look at the portion of the Zapruder film showing Kennedy's head being forcefully thrust backwards as a bullet strikes it from the front.  As you watch the film, remember that Oswald was inside the Dallas Book Depository, above and behind Kennedy's limousine when Kennedy was shot.  If a shot came from the front, it was not from Oswald's rifle.

Second, consider the deathbed confession of E. Howard Hunt, former CIA Agent and Watergate Conspirator.  Hunt, calling himself a "bench warmer" in the plot, alleges that numerous individuals connected with the CIA, along with Vice President Lyndon Johnson, planned and executed the assassination and subsequent cover-up. [first article] [second article]  And here is a very recent (May 18, 2007) article about problems in the conclusion that Oswald was the lone assassin:  "Kennedy Lone Gunman Theory Challenged".  

If this material hasn't convinced you that Oswald was not the lone assassin, here is a film by Alex Jones that almost certainly will.  It's an hour and half long, and well worth the time.

If elements of the U.S. Government were involved in the assassination of JFK, as the Zapruder film and the Hunt confession (along with other evidence far too extensive to present here) indicate, then we see that mass denial and the failure of the mainstream media to establish the truth are not unprecedented events.  If conditions existed in 1963 for our own government to kill the president and then cover up its involvement, it's hard to argue that these same conditions didn't still exist in 2001.  Our government is more powerful and more secretive than it was in 1963, not less.

A study of the mass denial in connection with the JFK assassination reveals what we may be dealing with in the context of 9/11 Truth.  E. Martin Schotz, in his essay entitled "The Waters of Knowledge versus the Waters of Uncertainty: Mass Denial in the Assassination of President Kennedy", says that our failure, as a society, to know who killed JFK "is not based on any lack of data or because the data is ambiguous. It is all extremely simple and obvious. Rather we don't know because we are deeply emotionally resistant to what such knowledge tells us about ourselves and our society. Furthermore the powers-that-be do not reward people for such knowledge. Indeed if a person is willing to acknowledge the truth, is in a position to share such knowledge with the public, and wishes to do so, then the organized institutions of our society will turn sharply against such a person."  His essay can be found here.

For articles on the failure of rational people to consider the 9/11 question, click here and here and here.

For more material regarding the assumption that 9/11 could not have been an inside job because somebody would have come forward by now, click here.

More articles and films on the JFK assassination:

http://www.prouty.org/giamarco.html

Here is a lecture by Michael Parenti on the JFK assassination and the nature of the state.