|
Do we really know what happened to
United Flight 93? Did it actually
land in Cleveland? Was it shot down?
If so, why the cover-up? Do
we really know who was behind the attacks of 9/11?
Do we not have an obligation to all of the people whose lives were lost
on 9/11, and to the families of these victims, to ask the difficult questions
and demand a real investigation? Why
did the Bush administration resist any inquiry into 9/11 for well over a year?
Why did Bush refuse to testify before the 9/11 Commission except with
Cheney present, and why did both of them refuse to testify under oath?
Why did the 9/11 Commission refuse to answer hundreds of questions and
leads that were presented to it? Consider
the following material. If you have
more questions, visit www.st911.org
and www.911truth.org.
For local events, visit www.vt911.org.
Plane Lands in Cleveland; Bomb Feared Aboard
Reported by: 9 News Staff. Web
produced by: Liz Forman. 9/11/01
11:43:57 AM. A Boeing 767 out of
Boston
made an emergency landing Tuesday at
Cleveland
Hopkins
International
Airport
due to concerns that it may have a bomb aboard, said Mayor Michael R. White. White
said the plane had been moved to a secure area of the airport, and was
evacuated. United identified
the plane as Flight 93. The airline did say how many people were aboard the
flight. United said it was
also "deeply concerned" about another flight, Flight 175, a Boeing
767, which was bound from
Boston
to
Los Angeles
. On behalf of the airline CEO James
Goodwin said: "The thoughts of everyone at United are with the passengers
and crew of these flights. Our prayers are also with everyone on the ground who
may have been involved. "United
is working with all the relevant authorities, including the FBI, to obtain
further information on these flights," he said.
http://web.archive.org/web/20021109040132/http:/wcpo.com/specials/2001/americaattacked/news_local/story14.html
FOX
News reporter: It looks like there's nothing there,
except for a hole in the ground.
Photographer
Chris Konicki: Ah, basically that's right. The only
thing you can see from where we where, ah, was a big gouge in the earth and some
broken trees. We could see some people working, walking around in the
area, but from where we could see it, there wasn't much left.
Reporter:
Any large pieces of debris at all?
Konicki:
Na, there was nothing, nothing that you could distinguish that a plane had
crashed there.
Reporter:
Smoke? Fire?
Konicki:
Nothing. It was absolutely quite. It was, uh, actually very quiet.
Um, nothing going on down there. No smoke. No fire.
Just a couple of people walking around. They looked like part of the NTSB
crew walking around, looking at the pieces..." - FOX (09/11/01)
"There's
a crater gouged in the earth, the plane is pretty much disintegrated. There's nothing left but scorched
trees," said Mark Stahl, of
Somerset
, who went to the scene." -CNN (09/11/01)
Ernie
Stull,
mayor of the nearby
village
of
Shanksville
recalls
[question]
They had been sent here because of a crash but there was no plane? Ernie
Stull: No. Nothing . Only this hole. [question]
I thought it was a crash site… Ernie Stull: And it is. But there was
nothing there to see. The plane had completely disintegrated. Puff. It hit
the ground and flew to pieces–completely." Question: At the very
first, what did you think it could be? Ernie
Stull: Well...that a plane had crashed. But when we got here, there wasn’t
anything. Question: What do
you mean--there wasn’t anything? Ernie
Stull: Well...there was no plane. There was what you see a hole. and that
is the dirt that the airliner threw out--and the hole, about 6 meters deep...and
that was all there was." - 9/11
File Unsolved
"I
stopped being coroner after about 20 minutes, because there were no bodies
there. There was just nothing visible. It was the strangest feeling."
Somerset
County
Coroner
, Wallace Miller. http://killtown.911review.org/htb2.html
"Miller was among the very first
to arrive after 10:06 on the magnificently sunny morning of September 11. He was
stunned at how small the smoking crater looked, he says, "like someone took
a scrap truck, dug a 10-foot ditch and dumped all this trash into it." - Washington
Post (05/12/02)
THE
WITNESSES:
At least SIX witnesses, including Susan Mcelwain, saw a small military
type plane flying around shortly BEFORE UA93 crashed. The FBI denies its
existence. THE DEBRIS: The
US Government insists the plane exploded on impact yet a one-ton section of the
engine was found over a mile away and other light debris was found scattered
over eight miles away. THE
MOBILE
CALL: Passenger
Edward Felt made an emergency call from the plane. He spoke of an explosion and
seeing some white smoke. The superviser who took the call has been gagged by the
FBI. THE F-16s: UA93
was identified as a hijack at 9.16am. At 9.35am three F-16s were ordered to
"protect the White House at all costs" when it turned towards the
capital. At 10.06 am it crashed at Shanksville, less than 10 mins flying time
from
Washington
. THE BLACK BOXES: Sources
claim the last thing heard on the cockpit voice recorder is the sound of wind -
suggesting the plane had been holed. THE
SONIC BOOM: The FBI
insists there was no military plane in the area but at 9.22am a sonic boom -
caused by a supersonic jet - was picked up by an earthquake monitor in southern
Pennsylvania
, 60 miles away from Shanksville. http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/allnews/page.cfm?objectid=12192317&method=full&siteid=50143
"I think all of us have a sense if
we imagine the kind of world we would face if the people who bombed the mess
hall in Mosul, or the people who did the bombing in Spain, or the people who
attacked the United States in New York, shot
down the plane over Pennsylvania and attacked the Pentagon, the people who
cut off peoples' heads on television to intimidate, to frighten – indeed the
word 'terrorized' is just that. Its purpose is to terrorize, to alter behavior,
to make people be something other than that which they want to be."
Donald Rumsfeld, speaking to the troops in
Iraq
, Christmas, 2004. http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=42112
In
all my years of direct and indirect participation, I never witnessed nor even
heard of an aircraft loss, where the wreckage was accessible, that prevented
investigators from finding enough hard evidence to positively identify the make,
model, and specific registration number of the aircraft -- and in most cases the
precise cause of the accident. This is because every military and civilian
passenger-carrying aircraft have many parts that are identified for safety of
flight. That is, if any of the parts were to fail at any time during a flight,
the failure would likely result in the catastrophic loss of aircraft and
passengers. Consequently, these parts are individually controlled by a
distinctive serial number and tracked by a records section of the maintenance
operation and by another section called plans and scheduling ...
The government alleges that four wide-body airliners crashed on the
morning of September 11 2001, resulting in the deaths of more than 3,000 human
beings, yet not one piece of hard aircraft evidence has been produced in an
attempt to positively identify any of the four aircraft. On the contrary, it
seems only that all potential evidence was deliberately kept hidden from public
view. The hard evidence would have included hundreds of critical time-change
aircraft items, plus security videotapes that were confiscated by the FBI
immediately following each tragic episode. George
Nelson, Colonel, USAF (ret.)
http://physics911.net/georgenelson.htm
The
first hijacking was suspected at not later than 8.20 a.m, and the last hijacked
aircraft crashed in
Pennsylvania
at 10.06 a.m. Not a single fighter plane was scrambled to investigate from the
US Andrews airforce base, just 10 miles from
Washington
DC
, until after the third plane had hit the Pentagon at 9.38 am. Why not? There
were standard FAA intercept procedures for hijacked aircraft before 9/11.
Between September 2000 and June 2001 the
US
military launched fighter aircraft on 67 occasions to chase suspicious aircraft
(AP, August 13 2002). It is a US legal requirement that once an aircraft has
moved significantly off its flight plan, fighter planes are sent up to
investigate. Michael
Meacher, British member of Parliment and former environment minister
http://politics.guardian.co.uk/iraq/comment/0,12956,1036687,00.html
At
9 11, four planes for two hours were able to drive around, fly around even one
hour in the direction going toward the west and then turn around and then
comeback. The military air force was
not able to interdict them. It's [un]imaginable.
Andreas Von Buelow, Former
assistant German defense minister, director of the German Secret Service,
minister for research and technology, and member of Parliament for 25 years.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/021104vonbuelow.html
|
